![]() ![]() If the question is objected to, the person asking the question might then be able to ask the question in a different way that makes more sense or is more specific.Įxample: Let’s say the opposing party asks “Can you tell the court where you went earlier?” The term “earlier” is not specific enough it’s vague. You would want to object to a vague question that is asked of your witness because of the risk that the witness will misunderstand the question and say something that will hurt your case. You: “Objection Your Honor, asked and answered.”Ī vague question is when it is difficult or impossible to tell what the question is about.Other party: “I’m talking about last year, you remember, the check I wrote for you, right?”.Other party: “You’re saying that I didn’t write you a check for $10,000?”.Other party: “Do you remember when I wrote you a check for $10,000?”.Either way, a question can only be asked once, and after it has been answered, any further attempts to ask the question are objectionable. Second, opposing counsel could repeatedly ask his/her own client the same question in slightly different ways, hoping that the client will give a better answer than one given before. ![]() What’s unique about this objection is that it could come up in two different scenarios, First, opposing counsel could repeatedly ask you or your witness the same question, hoping that contradicting answers will be given. Sometimes during cross-examination, the person asking questions might ask the same question over and over again, perhaps in slightly different ways, or re-ask a question s/he had asked earlier in the testimony.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |